Comments on: Wrong Lesson: Music is not an indication that content must be free.

By: sandyxxx

sandyxxx — Sat, 19 Dec 2009 13:57:30 +0000

It's good to know your stand towards this comment thing going on. I've visited some design sites before that I find have

repetitive comments from visitors, might be one of those you were pertaining to.

good deals--

By: sandyxxx

sandyxxx — Sat, 19 Dec 2009 06:57:30 +0000

By: davidaryan

davidaryan — Sun, 13 Dec 2009 09:19:58 +0000

Music absolutely does not have to be free and people are more than willing to pay for it. What people are willing to pay, and how they want to consume it has dramatically shifted. The music industry’s downfall was that they never adjusted their own perceptions on what music was worth.Why didn't people understand that music is the medicine of everything.

By: MaddisonS

MaddisonS — Thu, 05 Nov 2009 10:16:02 +0000

Napster was a flop, and the makers must have banged their heads against the wall.

By: jerrycarter

jerrycarter — Sat, 31 Oct 2009 08:24:18 +0000

What’s important is that we do not take away the wrong lesson from this. Newspapers, movies, content, and web apps do not have to be free. People are willing to pay for content, but it has to be instant, unlimited, comprehensive, and organized. The music industry failed because they couldn’t adapt to this new model, not because everyone demands free.

This is true. Consumers want the best for what they pay for. Many people are willing to pay but it should be unlimited access, quality services, and easy to manage. If the music industry wouldn't realize the point you're making, what would become of it?

rice military townhomes

By: wine glassware

wine glassware — Mon, 26 Oct 2009 16:52:19 +0000

I love music and music is music its fact !!

By: Reglan

Reglan — Mon, 05 Oct 2009 18:41:53 +0000

The only thing stopping the music industry from getting back to the equivalent of one-cd-per-month for every music fan is moving to an all-you-can-eat subscription model.

By: Band T shirts

Band T shirts — Thu, 01 Oct 2009 17:48:48 +0000

All of the money from the subscriptions would be split up based on what percentage of overall downloads each artist commands. If you’re an artist that can get everyones attention, then you’ll get a lot of the pool.

By: Acoustic

Acoustic — Thu, 24 Sep 2009 14:05:27 +0000

Music is own by publishers and its artist.Copying it without the permission of the owner is a violation of copyright.

By: lawyer austin

lawyer austin — Wed, 23 Sep 2009 12:41:04 +0000

in my opinion paying 20 bucks a month is much better than paying 1 dollar per song.. if we want to have save money on music downloads.